What do we mean when we say something is touching? McLuhan explained touch is the most involving of all the senses. Electricity hands out the Midas touch of the computer, “illuminates all it touches.”
She reached out
and you snubbed her
She reached out
and you snubbed her
You were rich
but she touched your blues
Any process that approaches instant interrelation of a total field tends to raise itself to the level of conscious awareness, so that computers seem to “think.” In fact, they are highly specialized at present, and quite lacking in the full process of interrelation that makes for consciousness. Obviously, they can be made to simulate the process of consciousness, just as our electric global networks now begin to simulate the condition of our central nervous system. But a conscious computer would still be one that was an extension of our consciousness, as a telescope is an extension of our eyes, or as a ventriloquist’s dummy is an extension of the ventriloquist.
Light filled your universe
but you said let there be more light
and your pockets of darkness grew
the presence of all things at once
More and more it has occurred to people that the sense of touch is necessary to integral existence. The weightless occupant of the space capsule has to fight to retain the integrating sense of touch. Our mechanical technologies for extending and separating the functions of our physical beings have brought us near to a state of disintegration by putting us out of touch with ourselves. It may very well be that in our conscious inner lives the interplay among our senses is what constitutes the sense of touch. Perhaps touch is not just skin contact with things, but the very life of things in the mind? The Greeks had the notion of a consensus or a faculty of “common sense” that translated each sense into each other sense, and conferred consciousness on man.
She said may I have this dance
but you avoided her touch
Light filled her smile
and you pulled her teeth
To the sense of touch, all things are sudden, counter, original, spare, strange. The “Pied Beauty” of G.M. Hopkins is a catalogue of the notes of the sense of touch. The poem is a manifesto of the nonvisual, and like Cezanne or Seurat, or Rouault it provides an indispensable approach to understanding TV. The nonvisual mosaic structures of modern art, like those of modern physics and electric-information patterns, permit little detachment. The mosaic form of the TV image demands participation and involvement in depth of the whole being, as does the sense of touch. Literacy, in contrast, had, by extending the visual power to the uniform organization of time and space, psychically and socially, conferred the power of detachment and noninvolvement.
She was everywhere
but not near
What you wanted
was not clear
It is the total involvement in all-inclusive nowness that occurs in young lives via TV’s mosaic image. This change of attitude has nothing to do with programming in any way, and would be the same if the programs consisted entirely of the highest cultural content.
You never admitted a mistake
You were a specialist of give and take
She wanted to dance cheek to cheek
You preferred check to check

Prose quotes taken from Marshall McLuhan’s “Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man,” 1964.
Click here to see a cartoon by Joe!
A Clean Well-Lighted Place.





