The ophthalmologist asked if I was still seeing the flashing lights. Rarely, but hard to predict. So the brain has gotten used to them, and is ignoring them, she said, and I immediately wondered why that same brain couldn’t ignore the tinnitus sounds also.
Sophisticated sound systems increase chances of distraction from random noise. If you must cough, wait until the crescendo is about to peak. Clarity of sound is valued. Increase pixels, dots, from cartoon to photograph. Whatever might muddy the waters is considered distraction. Clarity is a value that dithers. We must learn to connect the dots.
But what is distraction? And when might distraction be desirable? Rocks viewed through water look different after the creek dries out. The transistor radio is the perfect transmitter of the three minute basement tape composition recorded on a single track hand held device. Form may distort or obscure content so that we might hear, see, feel, smell, or taste what we might otherwise have missed, though the effort often fails.
Kindness, sense of humor, forgiving, joy of life.
Culture provides for cloistered clarity, photographs viewed through filters, the eye a sieve. The ear a strainer. We may not wince quite as much from scenes in a film when intoxicated from the smell of buttered popcorn.
“How do you know but every bird
that cuts the airy way
Is an immense world of delight,
closed by your senses five?”
Just so, but in any case,
“A fool sees not the same tree that a
wise man sees.”
(Two quotes above from William Blake’s The Marriage of Heaven and Hell).
I first heard of random noise working with some actuaries on multivariate analyses. In the context, noise is unpredictable and therefore unreliable. Random noise does not appear to correlate, nor can its causes or effects be accurately tracked or explained. Probability becomes problematic. The treatment is the same as for tinnitus, where smoothing or dithering renders the unwanted noise invisible. Random noise is asymmetrical, or anti-symmetrical, and expressed by numbers, sounds, colors, or any other output, a given sequence of random noise probably cannot be duplicated.
Things are rarely right on, but approximate; why then the need for clarity, for perfection, for proper grammar, pronunciation, spelling, punctuation? Prescription is an attempt to clarify, but description is far more accurate.
“Bright lights, big city, gone to my baby’s head” (Jimmy Reed, 1961).
Here is a four stanza composition, each stanza four lines long, expressing random noise in hexadecimal format. The piece can be played musically if each letter is expressed as a note and each number expressed as a duration (the absence of g might be noted, because the base is 16). There are no more instructions. The fewer instructions, the more random the results. Randomness may be the prefect solution for writers with copyright issues. Interested readers may reproduce the exercise below at the ANU Quantum Random Numbers Server, but no matter how many times you try, you will probably never come up with the same sequence shown below. Plus, each line below has been truncated from its original. Other arbitrary changes made to the original output from the server include all zeros removed, and spacing and line breaks added.
Dither # 1
1ee 9f 9f7454 cd2 a a77114 da a4
6f2 8eab 4fc1 bad b9a13 c8 d23
19f e3 5a 27bd 4c361 e8 dec c211
b3 6a f5 4645407 d85 9 fa 35 efcbbacb
86c c3 681 d5 f5 74bc c3a 8ee8 6 f2 92 c5
91 c5 1 b3 4 b7 f68793753 dd 38ba 34f1e2d
814 eff c6884 aa 30d4 e1 a8 dc5 6c 4b
182986 bfd 982 d5 805854 c7
fc6 6e2172 eab fb 2b5
74 4afef c8 40 c57 c9 4 bab 1
b86fa 8c 4 9a 39 ffba 99ac 89 bd5 be
97 b8 8c f79 477 a c5 7d 9d d 13b 2
53 79 53 d3 61d3b178c68882aa 6 cefbbf77
d8b449 efaf 73fa8917 bfb 473774ffc1 d7 d9dfe8
1d3c c8 99761685 c21cd9 2569935ca2de6b7 ebb
23513e76b828b a5 ac
And the lines below were copied from “The matrix” streamed live from the AUS Lab and pasted without changes, except to color – the original contains the matrix green flavor, but it wouldn’t copy, so I’ve approximated the color with a font change. As I read through the composition, I could find no distractions, but upon preview of the post, it appears that WordPress coding has been added, probably because of the change I made to the font color. I find the result distracting.
È[Õ‚‚ω9(C∫}¾„õ°v¸JËBؾ{ΨÉŠq®ψξ
.Ó½ïpÚ±/zò→‹πɲ˼ΦÏ‚óæ;MIÅ<9Ð9š֑±ªGæ↔Ñ
ïΧ8β)hDœa1tR˜Χε¯Š4∫ÈQ”R/Ì),¦êí‰f9õÚ¯Xîé:
#¿7{‘‡ÆÙ™κë‹g¡ÖÀoªyÖ‡ƒPiDë»öÝ√üÄΩ¹+∪ÊDγÌ
xKòÁNπ:∂t-Eh픉#.=φðρ—yœ9UR—λY¤ω→ÂZãé}:σ
öÝ=±¨Íθ*Ší%τ~νËÍ[&αζF7ÏòUœκ_λωW#θ‡ûqº•Ëã
ú‡LêμÞÑÖ2:λ∂F↓°ψÌ¡pΤ›e–à.N!ÎûƒûˆhqÔÏa?ƒ</span>
ÄO“jJω
<span style="color:#00ff00;"> ↔ζÆ~8ΤºÇ!#∄8ÃLLØθ¡&∪ß|cZk±xÁúο@∪ÏDÜþè'¡{</span>
<span style="color:#00ff00;"> ù’;θfÑÆÏ7ψμE„<ºÙ∃’a√ÖΧŠΣσÕ¢¥æÆ5Æρ
Readers often ask what a poem means. Usually, if nothing else, what poetry means, in spite of repetition in form and sound and sense, is that you can’t guess what comes next:
What is correct in quantum indeterminacy?
One year, we went to hear the jazz trumpeter Donald Byrd at the Ash Grove in Los Angeles. But he was too loud, and we had to leave. I’d already had some hearing damage, forgetting my ear plugs at the Fort Bliss rifle range, working the jack hammer from the compressor truck without plugs, thinking I guess that I was born with immortal hearing. Should have known better; my father suffered from ear damage. The high school I attended, Saint Bernard, in Playa del Rey, sat next to the runways of LAX, the planes taking off often a welcome break to a hard-boiled lecture.
My father often heard what was said, but muffled, without clarity. He taught himself to read lips. He was a good listener, and an avid talker, in spite of a stutter. I suspect he stuttered because he was unsure of pronunciations, the result of his hearing difficulties. Or maybe because he could not hear himself talk. One year, hearing aid technology having improved, he had surgery on both ears, to clear out rotted bone and crud, and was fitted with new hearing aids. In no time, his stutter disappeared. My mother was sure this was a miracle.
We went back to the Ash Grove to hear the guitarist John Fahey. We were seated in front. John came out with his guitar and a giant Bubble Up bottle. He sat down and drank the entire bottle of Bubble Up in one long swig, its neck stuck deep under his duck-like protruding upper lip. He put the bottle down on the floor and began to play guitar. I thought maybe he might use the Bubble Up bottle for some bottleneck guitar, but he did not. He said not one word the entire evening, nor do I recall a single burp. In short, he was not too loud. I still have his “The Yellow Princess” in vinyl album format, the one where you can hear the door close and footsteps.
The ophthalmologist asked me if my eyes felt like sandpaper. She said one of my optic nerves was larger than the other. I told her I also had asymmetrical hearing, which she apparently considered a distraction. She suggested artificial tears for the dry grit in the eyes feeling.
The brain is a megacity of flashing lights and random noise, a conurbation of neighborhoods in various stages of going to seed.
Perfection can happen in an instant, but falls flat with every attempt to reproduce it. I like what you say … ‘Kindness, sense of humour, forgiving, joy of life’ … with that attitude there’s a continuous kind of opening.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am blogging Joe and thankyou for your interest. However recently I have been rather slow in my output.
Always keeping up with the likes of yourself but slightly recalcitrant toward getting off my butt and posting.
I am writing a lot still but have become increasingly busy over recent times (like everyone), so this amounts to just jottings.
Please keep your own blog active as I for one, certainly enjoy it.Cheers B
LikeLiked by 1 person
So true Joe. While reading your post and thinking about situations of the day, Natalie Merchant serenades me in the background.
Whilst painting,many interviews and lectures are playing concurrently so my attention is multi-triggered.
Interesting subject you have raised. The brain has great abilities and one of which is the inclusion/ exclusion of subject detail. Tinnitus is a classic example of brain control.B
LikeLiked by 1 person
B: First, I’m sorry I mixed up hot and cool. McLuhan considered TV cool and radio hot. I’ve always thought he should have labeled them the other way around. But his idea was that the cool medium (e.g. TV) required more involvement from the audience. Neither here nor there, as you’ve seen. The point is that the brain is capable of creation as well as mirror, both lamp and mirror (i.e. the book The Lamp and the Mirror – one illuminates, the other absorbs). I don’t know much about Natalie Merchant. I will listen. Meantime, are you still blogging on yr site? I’ve not been tuned in. Please advise.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Really interesting post Joe (No surprises there).
It is said that, by way of our eyes, we see between 10 & 20% of what we determine as a picture. The rest is compiled through memory and patterns devised by the brain.
Should this be true then hearing, smelling, etc. must be largely subjective.
Therefore reading a poem or viewing a painting, one sees exactly that which they have exposed themselves to during the “Pattern formative years” 1-5.
Nothing is real!B
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, B. McLuhan said that of television – all those dots, we fill them in, there is no one pic. So he called it a hot medium. You can’t really watch TV and do something else, like wash the dishes, like you can listening to the radio. TV is audio/tactile, in his view.
LikeLike
Oooh….the lanterns change :) I don’t know how to do that. I don’t know how to do a lot of things.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, there’s a book, “The Mirror and the Lamp.” The idea questions whether or not we throw light on things, like a lantern, or take light in, like a mirror. Something like that. Thanks for reading and comment!
LikeLike